City prosecutors ask decide to throw Cincinnati landlord in jail for violating stalking purchase

CINCINNATI — A longtime Cincinnati landlord is a “threat to the local community” and must…

CINCINNATI — A longtime Cincinnati landlord is a “threat to the local community” and must be jailed till his felony stalking case is over, in accordance to a motion submitted on June 25 by Cincinnati’s Town Solicitor.

City prosecutors accuse the landlord, John Klosterman, 71, of regularly violating a civil stalking protection order that necessitates him to remain at the very least 500 ft away from his alleged victim, to not make contact with her or her employer, and to not stimulate any individual else to make contact with her.

Good deal Tan

The I-Staff interviews the alleged stalking sufferer in 2020

The alleged sufferer is one particular of Klosterman’s previous tenants.

“John has ongoing to make my life hell by skirting the boundaries of the safety get,” stated the female who accuses Klosterman of stalking her. “I have no peace.”

WCPO normally does not use nameless sources. In this case, the WCPO 9 I-Staff agreed to not discover the lady for the reason that she’s an alleged criminal offense sufferer who is fearful, and she thinks that she’s much less at threat in her own community if we don’t detect her.

Klosterman “is partaking in illegal and unethical enterprise procedures beneath the guise of having care of his own affairs in order to continue on resulting in psychological distress to the victim,” wrote Susan Zurface, demo counsel for the town, in her movement to revoke Klosterman’s bond.

The future court docket listening to is scheduled for July 7.

It is really the most recent chapter in Klosterman’s authorized troubles that started two a long time back when metropolis constructing inspectors initially cited him for code violations at his rental qualities.

John Klosterman at a November 2020 court hearing

WCPO staff

John Klosterman at a November 2020 court listening to

In 2016, a choose sentenced Klosterman to 60 times in jail for his “willful disregard” about a “dangerous” house he owned, according to courtroom records.

Courtroom information clearly show a receivership controls dozens of Klosterman’s homes in the Sedamsville community because he unsuccessful to pay a $578,000 court docket judgment for unpaid metropolis taxes, violations, fines and service fees.

Tri-Condition Organization is the property manager for the receivership. Klosterman’s alleged target is effective for the business.

“Klosterman has built countless complaints, attacking the victim’s employer,” Zurface wrote in her motion. “In the previous few weeks, at least thirty (30) problems have been designed by Defendant to the City of Cincinnati. Defendant has also contacted other community, Condition and Federal organizations and made untrue allegations relating to Tri-State Organization. Most of these problems have been investigated, at great price to every of those people companies and to Tri-Condition Corporation.”

In Sept. 2020, Klosterman and his wife, Sue, achieved a Consent Decree with the United States Attorney’s Place of work that bans them from leasing or taking care of household rental homes.

Underneath the Consent Decree, the Klostermans are also essential to spend $167,000 to 20 other women who said John Klosterman violated the Honest Housing Act by sexually harassing them while they rented from him.

“In this settlement, Klosterman acknowledges that the United States has proof he sexually harassed tenants on multiple situations,” said then-U.S. Attorney David M. DeVillers in a Sept. 2020 news release.

DeVillers identified as Klosterman’s conduct “heinous.”

In accordance to the city’s motion, Klosterman owns and actively manages residential rental homes in Sedamsville that are not element of the receivership, a violation of the federal Consent Decree.

634 Delhi Avenue in Cincinnati

Craig Cheatham

634 Delhi Avenue in Cincinnati

In February, a person of Klosterman’s new organizations, Bridges and Rivers, LLC, purchased a dwelling at 634 Delhi Ave., in accordance to data on the Hamilton County Auditor’s web-site.

“On June 16, 2021, it was found that the drinking water to this device was shut off due to a 2nd flooring leak,” wrote Zurface in her movement in municipal court. “Defendant advised the tenant at 634 Delhi that, pending resumption of h2o services, the tenant could shower in a different household situated at 621/623 Delhi, which is owned by Mr. Klosterman’s corporation, John Jennagans LLC. That residence is also NOT in the receivership.”

Part of an exterior wall is missing on the house at 621 Delhi Avenue in Cincinnati

Craig Cheatham

Part of an exterior wall is missing on the household at 621 Delhi Avenue in Cincinnati

In accordance to the Consent Decree, the Klostermans are expected to notify the United States Attorney’s Office inside of 30 times of getting a direct or oblique management or possession of residential rental house which is not portion of the receivership.

The Klostermans are also expected to have a assets supervisor authorised by federal prosecutors for rental housing that is not aspect of the receivership, in accordance to the Consent Decree.

In the city’s movement, Zurface wrote, Klosterman “has under no circumstances submitted agent information and facts to the Federal Prosecutors office.”

In her movement, Zurface wrote that Klosterman has interfered with Tri-Point out Organization’s management of properties in the receivership and has interacted with tenants of these houses, which is prohibited under the receivership and Consent Decree.

The Klostermans could be fined up to $100,000 for each individual violation of the Consent Decree, according to a federal statute cited in the agreement.

The Consent Decree is in outcome till October 2025, but it can be prolonged “if one or additional Defendants violates a person or more terms of the Decree or if the interests of justice so call for,” according to the arrangement.

“The U.S. Attorney’s Place of work is intently checking compliance with the Consent Decree and would be inclined to choose further more methods if those measures are warranted,” claimed Fred Alverson, spokesman for the United States Attorney’s Workplace for the Southern District of Ohio.

The Cincinnati Solicitor’s office has not responded to the I-Team’s requests for comment on the Klosterman situation.

Past November, Municipal Choose Brad Greenberg revoked Klosterman’s bond following prosecutors charged him for the fourth time with violating the safety purchase.

Court docket records show Greenberg afterwards set a $150,000 bond for Klosterman, who posted the bond.

Greenberg also required Klosterman to be positioned on “lockdown status” at Klosterman’s residence.

In addition, Klosterman will have to put on an digital checking unit.

“The sufferer cannot be safeguarded from Defendant’s actions even though he stays out on bond and EMD,” Zurface wrote in her movement to Greenberg.

In a text concept to the I-Staff, Klosterman declined our request for an interview.

“No remark,” Klosterman responded. “But be there at courtroom. Hear for your self.”